Candidate · P138 Kota Melaka (2004)
Public-record research, not a finding of wrongdoing. Ratings are analytical opinions. Disclaimer · Request a correction
Starting the research engine…
0 sources read · 0 records found
Current
Overall due diligence
Insufficient evidence
The public record here is limited to six official election results and contains no reporting, corporate, court or regulatory material, so no due-diligence level beyond the electoral facts can be assessed.
Electoral resilience
Medium
Records show three wins (1986, 1990, 1999) and three losses (1995 parliamentary and state, 2004) across a 1986-2004 span. Majorities were large when won, including 17,953 in 1990.
Political continuity
Stable
All six recorded contests were fought under the DAP banner, with coalition labels recorded as GR in 1990/1995 and BA in 1999. No party change is recorded.
Integrity signal
Open
The records contain no allegations, charges or cases, but they also contain no integrity reporting of any kind. Absence of such records is not evidence of a clean record.
Financial / corporate
Open
No company-registry (SSM), GLC, asset-declaration or credit checks are covered by the records. Corporate and financial exposure is unexamined.
How much due-diligence attention each area needs — not a finding of wrongdoing.
Records show election to state and federal seats, which carries PEP status; no ministerial or senior state post is recorded.
No record documents party posts, alliances or working relationships beyond candidacies.
No record covers public contracts, tenders or procurement decisions.
No company, GLC or foundation role is recorded in either direction.
No civil or criminal court matter appears in the records.
No regulatory action, charge or finding is recorded.
No asset declaration, income or financial disclosure material is included.
No media reporting or reputation material is included; the record is electoral only.
The records available consist solely of six official election results from 1986 to 2004, showing three wins and three losses for the DAP, including state and federal seats in Melaka and Perak. They establish elected-office PEP status but say nothing about party posts, business interests, litigation, finances or reputation. Because every non-electoral dimension is uncovered, the overall assessment is insufficient rather than low, and none of the open areas should be read as favourable. Enhanced checks against SSM, court, MACC and Hansard sources are required before any view is formed.
Public-record review · allegations ≠ findings · a charge is not a conviction · every point links to its source record (E official results, R reviewed records, N collected reports). Prepared by AI from the records on this page; not an analyst finding, and it can be wrong.
No biography collected yet.
Arrests, charges, convictions, sentences, acquittals and pardons as reported by credible sources. Each item is marked with its stage — a charge is not a conviction — and outcomes are listed where reported.
No legal history found in the sources collected so far.
Allegations and investigations as reported by credible outlets. An allegation is not a finding; read each with its stage and source.
No scandals or controversies found in the sources collected so far.
Nothing collected yet.
Contested 6 elections, won 3.
| Election | Seat | Ticket | Votes | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GE11 (2004) | P138 Kota Melaka | DAP | 30,998 49.8% | 2nd of 2 |
| GE10 (1999) | P123 Kota Melaka | DAP · BA | 33,472 58.2% | Won by 9,389 |
| Perak state election 1995 | N23 Tebing Tinggi | DAP · GR | 5,656 44.4% | 2nd of 2 |
| GE9 (1995) | P61 Ipoh Timor | DAP · GR | 23,837 49.7% | 2nd of 2 |
| GE8 (1990) | P58 Pasir Pinji | DAP · GR | 31,643 69.8% | Won by 17,953 |
| Melaka state election 1986 | N15 Durian Daun | DAP | 7,842 70.0% | Won by 4,808 |
Official gazetted results via the Malaysian Election Corpus (grade A record).
Collected automatically from credible outlets and Wikipedia, then cross-checked: Verified items match the official record, Confirmed items were reported by two or more different outlets, and single-source items are one outlet’s report. Partisan and anonymous claims are never shown.