Candidate · N30 Lukut (2013)
Public-record research, not a finding of wrongdoing. Ratings are analytical opinions. Disclaimer · Request a correction
Starting the research engine…
0 sources read · 0 records found
Current
Overall due diligence
Insufficient evidence
The records consist solely of six official election results and contain nothing on roles, finance, corporate interests or legal matters, so no due-diligence rating beyond the electoral record can be supported.
Electoral resilience
Medium
Four of six documented contests were lost (1978, 1982, 1986, 2004), followed by two wins at Lukut in 2008 and 2013 with majorities rising from 2,418 to 3,954.
Political continuity
Stable
Every documented candidacy from 1978 to 2013 was under DAP, with the 2008 and 2013 contests recorded as DAP/PR; no party change appears in the records. The years between contests are not covered.
Integrity signal
Open
The records contain no allegation, charge, conviction or court matter, but they also contain no integrity reporting at all. This is an absence of coverage, not a verified clean record.
Financial / corporate
Open
No company-registry, GLC, asset-declaration, credit or bankruptcy check is included in the records.
How much due-diligence attention each area needs — not a finding of wrongdoing.
Documented as a two-term state assembly representative for Lukut, which carries PEP exposure by virtue of the office alone.
The records show candidacies and results only; no documented roles, appointments or working relationships.
No record of committee, exco, statutory-body or tender-related positions.
No directorship, shareholding or GLC appointment is recorded.
No court or legal matter appears in, or is excluded by, the records.
No charge, finding or investigation is recorded, and no negative screening is included.
No asset declaration, income or financial disclosure is covered.
The records contain no media reporting or reputational material, positive or adverse.
The supplied public record on Ean Yong Tin Sin is limited to six official election results spanning 1978 to 2013, showing an unbroken run of DAP candidacies across Selangor and Negeri Sembilan, four losses, and two winning terms at Lukut in 2008 and 2013 on rising majorities. Nothing in the records covers offices held, appointments, business or corporate interests, procurement exposure, finances, litigation or media coverage, so those areas are marked open rather than assessed. The records are too thin to support an overall due-diligence rating, and the absence of adverse material here should not be read as a clean record.
Public-record review · allegations ≠ findings · a charge is not a conviction · every point links to its source record (E official results, R reviewed records, N collected reports). Prepared by AI from the records on this page; not an analyst finding, and it can be wrong.
No biography collected yet.
Arrests, charges, convictions, sentences, acquittals and pardons as reported by credible sources. Each item is marked with its stage — a charge is not a conviction — and outcomes are listed where reported.
No legal history found in the sources collected so far.
Allegations and investigations as reported by credible outlets. An allegation is not a finding; read each with its stage and source.
No scandals or controversies found in the sources collected so far.
Nothing collected yet.
Contested 6 elections, won 2.
| Election | Seat | Ticket | Votes | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negeri Sembilan state election 2013 | N30 Lukut | DAP · PR | 7,692 67.3% | Won by 3,954 |
| Negeri Sembilan state election 2008 | N30 Lukut | DAP · PR | 5,579 63.8% | Won by 2,418 |
| Negeri Sembilan state election 2004 | N1 Chennah | DAP | 2,573 38.5% | 2nd of 2 |
| Selangor state election 1986 | N41 Sungai Pelik | DAP | 2,997 31.4% | 2nd of 2 |
| Selangor state election 1982 | N18 Kajang | DAP | 6,053 41.6% | 2nd of 2 |
| Negeri Sembilan state election 1978 | N1 Kuala Klawang | DAP | 2,392 33.4% | 2nd of 3 |
Official gazetted results via the Malaysian Election Corpus (grade A record).
Collected automatically from credible outlets and Wikipedia, then cross-checked: Verified items match the official record, Confirmed items were reported by two or more different outlets, and single-source items are one outlet’s report. Partisan and anonymous claims are never shown.