Candidate · N26 Tebing Tinggi (2008)
Public-record research, not a finding of wrongdoing. Ratings are analytical opinions. Disclaimer · Request a correction
Starting the research engine…
0 sources read · 0 records found
Current
No current role in the records collected so far.
Overall due diligence
Insufficient evidence
The records consist only of official election results from 1990 to 2008, with no reporting, corporate, financial, litigation or media material, so no due-diligence assessment of the person can be made.
Electoral resilience
Medium
Three consecutive Perak state wins at Tebing Tinggi in 1995, 1999 and 2004, but with narrowing margins (1441, 1252, 1027), followed by a loss in 2008; an earlier 1990 parliamentary bid at Pasir Pinji was also lost.
Political continuity
Open
All five recorded candidacies are under MCA/BN, so no party or coalition change appears in the records; nothing is documented after the 2008 loss.
Integrity signal
Open
The records contain no allegations, charges, convictions or court matters, but they also contain no integrity checks at all, so this cannot be read as clearance.
Financial / corporate
Open
No company-registry, GLC, asset, credit or tax checks are covered by the records provided.
How much due-diligence attention each area needs — not a finding of wrongdoing.
Records show three terms as an elected Perak state assembly representative, a PEP role arising from office rather than from any wrongdoing.
Records document only electoral contests; no relationships, roles or alliances are documented.
No record covers contracts, tenders, statutory bodies or procurement decisions.
No directorship, shareholding, GLC or foundation role is documented in the records.
No court matters, civil suits or cause lists are covered by the records.
No regulatory action, charge or finding appears in the records; this reflects absent coverage, not a clean result.
No asset declarations, statutory declarations or financial statements are covered.
No media reporting or public statements are included in the records.
The records available are limited to official election results: an unsuccessful 1990 parliamentary bid in Pasir Pinji, three consecutive Perak state wins in Tebing Tinggi (1995, 1999, 2004) with declining margins, and a loss in 2008. That establishes a period as an elected MCA/BN state representative, which creates PEP exposure from the office itself. Nothing in the records speaks to corporate interests, litigation, regulatory matters, finances or reputation, so all of those areas remain open rather than clear.
Public-record review · allegations ≠ findings · a charge is not a conviction · every point links to its source record (E official results, R reviewed records, N collected reports). Prepared by AI from the records on this page; not an analyst finding, and it can be wrong.
No biography collected yet.
Arrests, charges, convictions, sentences, acquittals and pardons as reported by credible sources. Each item is marked with its stage — a charge is not a conviction — and outcomes are listed where reported.
No legal history found in the sources collected so far.
Allegations and investigations as reported by credible outlets. An allegation is not a finding; read each with its stage and source.
No scandals or controversies found in the sources collected so far.
Nothing collected yet.
Contested 5 elections, won 3.
| Election | Seat | Ticket | Votes | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perak state election 2008 | N26 Tebing Tinggi | MCA · BN | 4,682 39.4% | 2nd of 2 |
| Perak state election 2004 | N26 Tebing Tinggi | MCA · BN | 6,313 54.4% | Won by 1,027 |
| Perak state election 1999 | N23 Tebing Tinggi | MCA · BN | 6,894 55.0% | Won by 1,252 |
| Perak state election 1995 | N23 Tebing Tinggi | MCA · BN | 7,097 55.6% | Won by 1,441 |
| GE8 (1990) | P58 Pasir Pinji | MCA · BN | 13,690 30.2% | 2nd of 2 |
Official gazetted results via the Malaysian Election Corpus (grade A record).
Collected automatically from credible outlets and Wikipedia, then cross-checked: Verified items match the official record, Confirmed items were reported by two or more different outlets, and single-source items are one outlet’s report. Partisan and anonymous claims are never shown.